AI training creates no fixed, human-readable embodiment of the source material; models retain only non-expressive statistical weightings. Even if training were deemed copying, it is a highly transformative use. The infringement inquiry should therefore shift downstream to users who intentionally prompt a model to reproduce protected expression. Refocusing the law this way preserves copyright’s incentive structure while allowing AI research and innovation to flourish.
Read More →California's SB 37 classifies law firm AI chatbots as advertising, holding attorneys strictly liable for automated responses. This guide explores the intersection of marketing compliance and the urgent risks to attorney-client privilege highlighted by recent case law.
Read More →











